antimouse cd4 Search Results


95
Miltenyi Biotec mouse cd4 miltenyi biotec
Mouse Cd4 Miltenyi Biotec, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse cd4 miltenyi biotec/product/Miltenyi Biotec
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse cd4 miltenyi biotec - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

cd4  (Bio-Rad)
95
Bio-Rad cd4
Cd4, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cd4/product/Bio-Rad
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
Bio X Cell anti cd4
Anti Cd4, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti cd4/product/Bio X Cell
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti cd4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Bio X Cell rat igg2a
Rat Igg2a, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rat igg2a/product/Bio X Cell
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat igg2a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Bio X Cell anti mouse cd4
Figure 4. ULBP2 inhibits anti-tumor immunity mediated by NK cells. (A) Tumor growth in C57BL/6 mice subcutaneously transplanted with B16F10-mock cells (1 × 106). Anti-NKG2D antibody (clone HMG2D), anti-mouse <t>CD4</t> antibody (clone <t>YTS191),</t> anti-mouse CD8α antibody (clone 2.43), or anti-mouse NK1.1 antibody (clone PK136) was administered intraperitoneally at 300 µg/mouse on day 0 post-transplantation, followed by 200 µg/mouse on days 3, 7, and 13. PBS (−) was administered as a control on the same schedule. Arrows indicate treatment days. Tumor sizes were measured three times per week using an electronic caliper (n = 5). Due to the euthanization of one mouse because of tumor ulceration, the data point for day 17 post-transplantation in the anti-NK1.1 group was unavailable. (B) Photos of tumors harvested on day 17, post-transplantation, from the experiment shown in (A). (C) Tumor weights of all tumors harvested on day 17, post-transplantation, from (A). The anti-NK1.1 group was excluded from statistical comparisons due to data loss. NA indicates exclusion from statistical comparisons. (D) Tumor growth in C57BL/6 mice subcutaneously transplanted with B16F10-ULBP2 cells (1 × 106) and treated as described in (A), except that no antibody was administered on day 13. Tumor growth was monitored as described above (n = 5). (E) Photos of tumors harvested on day 13 post-transplantation from the experiment shown in (D). (F) Tumor weights of all tumors harvested on day 13 post-transplantation from (D). (G) Schematic representation of the proposed mechanisms. A question mark and a dotted line indicate a potential mechanism suggested by our observations, but not directly demonstrated in this study. Illustration was created with BioRender.com. In (A,D), data are presented as the mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; ns: Not significant (Mann–Whitney U test: control vs. anti-NK1.1 group). In (C,F), individual values are shown with the mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05; ns: not significant (Mann–Whitney U test: control vs. each treatment group).
Anti Mouse Cd4, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti mouse cd4/product/Bio X Cell
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti mouse cd4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Cedarlane incubation with anti cd4
Figure 4. ULBP2 inhibits anti-tumor immunity mediated by NK cells. (A) Tumor growth in C57BL/6 mice subcutaneously transplanted with B16F10-mock cells (1 × 106). Anti-NKG2D antibody (clone HMG2D), anti-mouse <t>CD4</t> antibody (clone <t>YTS191),</t> anti-mouse CD8α antibody (clone 2.43), or anti-mouse NK1.1 antibody (clone PK136) was administered intraperitoneally at 300 µg/mouse on day 0 post-transplantation, followed by 200 µg/mouse on days 3, 7, and 13. PBS (−) was administered as a control on the same schedule. Arrows indicate treatment days. Tumor sizes were measured three times per week using an electronic caliper (n = 5). Due to the euthanization of one mouse because of tumor ulceration, the data point for day 17 post-transplantation in the anti-NK1.1 group was unavailable. (B) Photos of tumors harvested on day 17, post-transplantation, from the experiment shown in (A). (C) Tumor weights of all tumors harvested on day 17, post-transplantation, from (A). The anti-NK1.1 group was excluded from statistical comparisons due to data loss. NA indicates exclusion from statistical comparisons. (D) Tumor growth in C57BL/6 mice subcutaneously transplanted with B16F10-ULBP2 cells (1 × 106) and treated as described in (A), except that no antibody was administered on day 13. Tumor growth was monitored as described above (n = 5). (E) Photos of tumors harvested on day 13 post-transplantation from the experiment shown in (D). (F) Tumor weights of all tumors harvested on day 13 post-transplantation from (D). (G) Schematic representation of the proposed mechanisms. A question mark and a dotted line indicate a potential mechanism suggested by our observations, but not directly demonstrated in this study. Illustration was created with BioRender.com. In (A,D), data are presented as the mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; ns: Not significant (Mann–Whitney U test: control vs. anti-NK1.1 group). In (C,F), individual values are shown with the mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05; ns: not significant (Mann–Whitney U test: control vs. each treatment group).
Incubation With Anti Cd4, supplied by Cedarlane, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/incubation with anti cd4/product/Cedarlane
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
incubation with anti cd4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Cytek Biosciences apc anti mouse cd4
Fig. 3. CKI improves immunity in the tumor xenograft model in cooperation with DDP. (A) Mean thymus and spleen indices of different groups. (B) Representative flow cytometry images of CD3+ T cells, <t>CD4+</t> T cells, CD8+ T cells in tumor tissues. (C) Representative flow cytometry images of CD3+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells in spleen tissues. (D) H & E staining of tumor sections. Data are presented as mean ± SD of 6 mice per group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. model group. #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 vs. DDP group. CKIMD, CKI middle dose; CKIHD, CKI high dose.
Apc Anti Mouse Cd4, supplied by Cytek Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/apc anti mouse cd4/product/Cytek Biosciences
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
apc anti mouse cd4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Miltenyi Biotec cd4 biotin
Fig. 3. CKI improves immunity in the tumor xenograft model in cooperation with DDP. (A) Mean thymus and spleen indices of different groups. (B) Representative flow cytometry images of CD3+ T cells, <t>CD4+</t> T cells, CD8+ T cells in tumor tissues. (C) Representative flow cytometry images of CD3+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells in spleen tissues. (D) H & E staining of tumor sections. Data are presented as mean ± SD of 6 mice per group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. model group. #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 vs. DDP group. CKIMD, CKI middle dose; CKIHD, CKI high dose.
Cd4 Biotin, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cd4 biotin/product/Miltenyi Biotec
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd4 biotin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Cytek Biosciences rm4 5 tonbo cat no 75 0042 u100 anti cd4 pecy7
Fig. 3. CKI improves immunity in the tumor xenograft model in cooperation with DDP. (A) Mean thymus and spleen indices of different groups. (B) Representative flow cytometry images of CD3+ T cells, <t>CD4+</t> T cells, CD8+ T cells in tumor tissues. (C) Representative flow cytometry images of CD3+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells in spleen tissues. (D) H & E staining of tumor sections. Data are presented as mean ± SD of 6 mice per group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. model group. #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 vs. DDP group. CKIMD, CKI middle dose; CKIHD, CKI high dose.
Rm4 5 Tonbo Cat No 75 0042 U100 Anti Cd4 Pecy7, supplied by Cytek Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rm4 5 tonbo cat no 75 0042 u100 anti cd4 pecy7/product/Cytek Biosciences
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rm4 5 tonbo cat no 75 0042 u100 anti cd4 pecy7 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Cytek Biosciences anti mouse cd4 pe cy7
Fig. 3. CKI improves immunity in the tumor xenograft model in cooperation with DDP. (A) Mean thymus and spleen indices of different groups. (B) Representative flow cytometry images of CD3+ T cells, <t>CD4+</t> T cells, CD8+ T cells in tumor tissues. (C) Representative flow cytometry images of CD3+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells in spleen tissues. (D) H & E staining of tumor sections. Data are presented as mean ± SD of 6 mice per group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. model group. #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 vs. DDP group. CKIMD, CKI middle dose; CKIHD, CKI high dose.
Anti Mouse Cd4 Pe Cy7, supplied by Cytek Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti mouse cd4 pe cy7/product/Cytek Biosciences
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti mouse cd4 pe cy7 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Elabscience Biotechnology fluorescein isothiocyanate fitc anti mouse cd4
Fig. 3. CKI improves immunity in the tumor xenograft model in cooperation with DDP. (A) Mean thymus and spleen indices of different groups. (B) Representative flow cytometry images of CD3+ T cells, <t>CD4+</t> T cells, CD8+ T cells in tumor tissues. (C) Representative flow cytometry images of CD3+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells in spleen tissues. (D) H & E staining of tumor sections. Data are presented as mean ± SD of 6 mice per group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. model group. #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 vs. DDP group. CKIMD, CKI middle dose; CKIHD, CKI high dose.
Fluorescein Isothiocyanate Fitc Anti Mouse Cd4, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fluorescein isothiocyanate fitc anti mouse cd4/product/Elabscience Biotechnology
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fluorescein isothiocyanate fitc anti mouse cd4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Figure 4. ULBP2 inhibits anti-tumor immunity mediated by NK cells. (A) Tumor growth in C57BL/6 mice subcutaneously transplanted with B16F10-mock cells (1 × 106). Anti-NKG2D antibody (clone HMG2D), anti-mouse CD4 antibody (clone YTS191), anti-mouse CD8α antibody (clone 2.43), or anti-mouse NK1.1 antibody (clone PK136) was administered intraperitoneally at 300 µg/mouse on day 0 post-transplantation, followed by 200 µg/mouse on days 3, 7, and 13. PBS (−) was administered as a control on the same schedule. Arrows indicate treatment days. Tumor sizes were measured three times per week using an electronic caliper (n = 5). Due to the euthanization of one mouse because of tumor ulceration, the data point for day 17 post-transplantation in the anti-NK1.1 group was unavailable. (B) Photos of tumors harvested on day 17, post-transplantation, from the experiment shown in (A). (C) Tumor weights of all tumors harvested on day 17, post-transplantation, from (A). The anti-NK1.1 group was excluded from statistical comparisons due to data loss. NA indicates exclusion from statistical comparisons. (D) Tumor growth in C57BL/6 mice subcutaneously transplanted with B16F10-ULBP2 cells (1 × 106) and treated as described in (A), except that no antibody was administered on day 13. Tumor growth was monitored as described above (n = 5). (E) Photos of tumors harvested on day 13 post-transplantation from the experiment shown in (D). (F) Tumor weights of all tumors harvested on day 13 post-transplantation from (D). (G) Schematic representation of the proposed mechanisms. A question mark and a dotted line indicate a potential mechanism suggested by our observations, but not directly demonstrated in this study. Illustration was created with BioRender.com. In (A,D), data are presented as the mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; ns: Not significant (Mann–Whitney U test: control vs. anti-NK1.1 group). In (C,F), individual values are shown with the mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05; ns: not significant (Mann–Whitney U test: control vs. each treatment group).

Journal: International journal of molecular sciences

Article Title: ULBP2 Promotes Tumor Progression by Suppressing NKG2D-Mediated Anti-Tumor Immunity.

doi: 10.3390/ijms26072950

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 4. ULBP2 inhibits anti-tumor immunity mediated by NK cells. (A) Tumor growth in C57BL/6 mice subcutaneously transplanted with B16F10-mock cells (1 × 106). Anti-NKG2D antibody (clone HMG2D), anti-mouse CD4 antibody (clone YTS191), anti-mouse CD8α antibody (clone 2.43), or anti-mouse NK1.1 antibody (clone PK136) was administered intraperitoneally at 300 µg/mouse on day 0 post-transplantation, followed by 200 µg/mouse on days 3, 7, and 13. PBS (−) was administered as a control on the same schedule. Arrows indicate treatment days. Tumor sizes were measured three times per week using an electronic caliper (n = 5). Due to the euthanization of one mouse because of tumor ulceration, the data point for day 17 post-transplantation in the anti-NK1.1 group was unavailable. (B) Photos of tumors harvested on day 17, post-transplantation, from the experiment shown in (A). (C) Tumor weights of all tumors harvested on day 17, post-transplantation, from (A). The anti-NK1.1 group was excluded from statistical comparisons due to data loss. NA indicates exclusion from statistical comparisons. (D) Tumor growth in C57BL/6 mice subcutaneously transplanted with B16F10-ULBP2 cells (1 × 106) and treated as described in (A), except that no antibody was administered on day 13. Tumor growth was monitored as described above (n = 5). (E) Photos of tumors harvested on day 13 post-transplantation from the experiment shown in (D). (F) Tumor weights of all tumors harvested on day 13 post-transplantation from (D). (G) Schematic representation of the proposed mechanisms. A question mark and a dotted line indicate a potential mechanism suggested by our observations, but not directly demonstrated in this study. Illustration was created with BioRender.com. In (A,D), data are presented as the mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; ns: Not significant (Mann–Whitney U test: control vs. anti-NK1.1 group). In (C,F), individual values are shown with the mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05; ns: not significant (Mann–Whitney U test: control vs. each treatment group).

Article Snippet: NKG2D blockade, CD4+ T cell depletion, CD8+ T cell depletion, and NK cell depletion were performed by intraperitoneally administering anti-mouse NKG2D (clone HMG2D, BE0111, Bio X Cell; Lebanon, NH, USA; RRID:AB_10950118), anti-mouse CD4 (clone YTS191, BE0119, Bio X Cell; RRID:AB_10950382), anti-mouse CD8α (clone 2.43, BE0061, Bio X Cell; RRID:AB_1125541), and anti-mouse NK1.1 antibodies (clone PK136, BE0036, Bio X Cell; RRID:AB_1107737).

Techniques: Transplantation Assay, Control, MANN-WHITNEY

Fig. 3. CKI improves immunity in the tumor xenograft model in cooperation with DDP. (A) Mean thymus and spleen indices of different groups. (B) Representative flow cytometry images of CD3+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells in tumor tissues. (C) Representative flow cytometry images of CD3+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells in spleen tissues. (D) H & E staining of tumor sections. Data are presented as mean ± SD of 6 mice per group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. model group. #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 vs. DDP group. CKIMD, CKI middle dose; CKIHD, CKI high dose.

Journal: Phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology

Article Title: Compound Kushen Injection inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition of gastric carcinoma by regulating VCAM1 induced by the TNF signaling pathway.

doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2023.154984

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 3. CKI improves immunity in the tumor xenograft model in cooperation with DDP. (A) Mean thymus and spleen indices of different groups. (B) Representative flow cytometry images of CD3+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells in tumor tissues. (C) Representative flow cytometry images of CD3+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells in spleen tissues. (D) H & E staining of tumor sections. Data are presented as mean ± SD of 6 mice per group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. model group. #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 vs. DDP group. CKIMD, CKI middle dose; CKIHD, CKI high dose.

Article Snippet: BB515 Rat Anti-Mouse CD45 (BD, USA), APC/FireTM 750 antimouse CD3, APC anti-mouse CD4, and PE/Cyanine7 anti-mouse CD8a (BioLegend, USA) were used to label CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells, and measurement was performed by flow cytometry (Cytek, USA).

Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Staining